If you are a data scientist, a software developer, or in the social and human sciences with interest in digital humanities, then you’re no stranger to the ongoing discussions on how algorithms embed biases, and discrimination and the call for critical and ethical engagement.
I have keenly been following such discussion for a while and this post is an attempt to put together the articles, books, book reviews, videos, interviews, twitter threads and so on., that I’ve come across in one place so it can be used as a resource.
This list is by no means exhaustive and as more and more awareness is being raised, there are more pieces/articles/journal papers being written on a daily basis. I plan to update these lists regularly. Also, if you think there are relevant material that I have not included, please leave them as a comment and I will add them.
Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy by Cathy O’Neil. A great number of the article on the list below are written by O’Neil. She is also active on Twitter regularly posting links and interesting critical insights on everything to do with mathematical models and bias. Here is my own review of O’Neil’s book with plenty of relevant links itself and here for another excellent review of O’Neil’s book.
Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce – below is an excerpt from Nobel’s book:
Run a Google search for “black girls”—what will you find? “Big Booty” and other sexually explicit terms are likely to come up as top search terms. But, if you type in “white girls,” the results are radically different. The suggested porn sites and un-moderated discussions about “why black women are so sassy” or “why black women are so angry” presents a disturbing portrait of black womanhood in modern society.In Algorithms of Oppression, Safiya Umoja Noble challenges the idea that search engines like Google offer an equal playing field for all forms of ideas, identities, and activities. Data discrimination is a real social problem; Noble argues that the combination of private interests in promoting certain sites, along with the monopoly status of a relatively small number of Internet search engines, leads to a biased set of search algorithms that privilege whiteness and discriminate against people of color, specifically women of color.
Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths. This book is concerned with the workings of the human mind and how computer science can help human decision making. Here is a post by Artem Kaznatcheev on Computational Kindness which might give you a glimpse of the some of the issues that book covers. Here is a long interview with Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths and a TED Talk with Tom Griffiths on The Computer Science of Human Decision Making.
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information by Frank Pasquale. You can read the introduction and conclusion chapters of his book here. And here is a good review of Pasquale’s book. You can follow his twitter stream here.
Here is a synopsis: A revealing look at how tech industry bias and blind spots get baked into digital products—and harm us all.
Buying groceries, tracking our health, finding a date: whatever we want to do, odds are that we can now do it online. But few of us ask why all these digital products are designed the way they are. It’s time we change that. Many of the services we rely on are full of oversights, biases, and downright ethical nightmares: Chatbots that harass women. Signup forms that fail anyone who’s not straight. Social media sites that send peppy messages about dead relatives. Algorithms that put more black people behind bars.
Sara Wachter-Boettcher takes an unflinching look at the values, processes, and assumptions that lead to these and other problems. Technically Wrong demystifies the tech industry, leaving those of us on the other side of the screen better prepared to make informed choices about the services we use—and demand more from the companies behind them.
TED Talks, podcasts, and interviews
How I’m fighting bias in algorthims TED Talk – MIT Researcher Joy Buolamwini, November 2016
More recently, April, 2017 The era of blind faith in big data must end TED Talk – Cathy O’Neil
Another TED Talk – Zeynep Tufekci emphasizes the importance of human values and ethics in the age of machine intelligence and algorithmic decision makings Machine intelligence makes human morals more important November 11, 2017
Data is the new gold, who are the new thieves? TED Talk – Tijmen Schep 2016
O’Neil’s interview with Politics Weekly podcast (starts 30mins in) July 5, 2017. O’Neil calls for public awareness on how algorithms are used, often without our knowledge, in job interviews, for example., and explains why we should question and interrogate these algorithms which are often presented to us as authoritative.
A short interview with Frank Pasquale on his book Black Box Society May 12, 2016. Pasquale emphasizes the opaqueness of algorithms and argues on why we should demand transparency.
A 2 minutes video, a prototype example, of algorithms being used in recruitment. A working example of the kind of dangerous AI used for recruiting that experts such as O’Neil constantly warn against. This post provides a critical analysis of why such endeavors are futile and dangerous.
Tom Chatfield on Critical Thinking October 2, 2017 In this philosophically themed podcast Chatfield discusses issues such as “how new digital realities interact with old human biases” with Dave Edmonds.
Social Cooling is a term that refers to a gradual long term negative side effects of living in an digital society where our digital activities are tracked and recorded. Such awareness of potentially being scored by algorithms leads to a gradual behaviour change: self-censorship and self-surveillance. Here is a piece on what looks like social cooling in action. The website itself has plenty of resources that can aid critical thinking and touches up on big philosophical, economical and societal questions in relation to data and privacy.
For those interested in critical thinking, data and models Calling Bullshit offers various resources and tools for spotting and calling bullshit. This website, developed for a course entitled ‘Calling Bullshit’, is a great place to explore and learn about all things “data reasoning for the digital age”.
Another important website that is worth a mention here is Algorithmic Justice League where you can report algorithm bias, participate in testing software for inclusive training set, or where you can simply donate and contribute raising awareness about existing bias in coded systems.
fast.ai a project that aims to increase diversity in the field of deep learning and make deep learning accessible and inclusive to all.
ConceptNet Numberbatch 17.04: better, less-stereotyped word vectors This is not a website but a blogpost. I am putting it here with other websites as the author offers some solution to reducing biases when building algorithms for natural language understanding beyond simply stating that such algorithms are biased.
Biology/genetics – (Digital phrenology?)
It is difficult to draw a line and put certain articles under the category of social, biological, political, or other as they seem to be somehow all interlinked. Nonetheless, I think the following articles can loosely be described as dealing with biological/genetics material. Towards the end of this post, I have also thematized some articles under the category of ‘political’.
In a recent preprint paper “Deep Neural Networks Can Detect Sexual Orientation From Faces” (here are the Gurdian and the Economist reportings) Yilun Wang and Michal Kosinski calmed that their deep neural network can be trained to discern individuals’ sexual orientations from their photographs. The paper has attracted and continues to attract a massive attentions and has generated numerous responses, outrages and discussion. Here is an in-depth analysis from Calling Bullshit and here for a detailed technical assessment and here for a comprehensive and eloquent response from Greggor Mattson. Here is another response and another one here from a data scientist’s perspective and another recent response from O’Neil here. If you only want to read just one response, I highly recommend reading Mattson’s. There have been been plenty of discussions and threads on Twitter – here and here are a couple of examples. It is worth noting that Kosinski, one of the authors of the above paper, is listed as one of the the advisers for a company called Faception, an Israeli security firm that promises clients to deploy “facial personality profiling” to catch pedophiles and terrorists among others.
When advanced technologies in genetics and face recognition are applied with the assumption that “technology is neutral”, the consequences are often catastrophic and dangerous. These two pieces, Sci-fi crime drama with a strong black lead and Traces of Crime: How New York’s DNA Techniques Became Tainted provide some in-depth analysis of such.
Physiognomy’s New Clothes this is a comprehensive and eloquent piece and well worth your time. Physiognomy, the practice of using people’s outer appearance to infer inner character is a practice that is now discredited and discarded as phrenology. However, this piece illustrates how such practice is alive and well in the era of big data and machine learning. Here is more on the Wu and Zhang paper that the Physignomy’s New Clothes authors cover in the above piece.
General articles on various automated systems and bias, discrimination, unfairness, ethical concerns, etc., listed in order of publication dates starting from the latest.
AI Experts Want to End ‘Black Box’ Algorithms in Government October 18, 2017
Estonia Proposes Bill of Rights and Responsibilities for Robots October 17, 2017
Asking the Right Questions About AI October 12, 2017
Facebook’s Ad Scandal Isn’t a ‘Fail,’ It’s a Feature September 23, 2017
BBC News – Facebook can’t hide behind algorithms September 22, 2017
Data power could make 1984 ‘look like a Teddy bear’s picnic’ September 21, 2017
AI Research Is in Desperate Need of an Ethical Watchdog September 18, 2017
Getting serious about research ethics: AI and machine learning September 18, 2017
Machines are getting schooled on fairness September 16, 2017
Facebook and Google, show us your ad data Understanding how they influence us is crucial to the future of our democracy. September 13, 2017
Understanding Bias in Algorithmic Design Human judgement lies behind every data-driven decision. Left unexamined, value-laden software can have unintended discriminatory effects. September 6, 2017
Report: Britain’s Cops Have Big Data But Not Big Analysis September 6, 2017
Turns out algorithms are racist August 31, 2017
Technology is biased too. How do we fix it? July 20, 2017
How can we stop algorithms telling lies? July 16, 2017
How to Call B.S. on Big Data: A Practical Guide June 3, 2017
Secret algorithms threaten the rule of law June 1, 2017
On Facebook May 7, 2017
How artificial intelligence learns to be racist April 17, 2017
An AI stereotype catcher April 14, 2017
AI learns gender and racial biases from language April 13, 2017
Will the future be full of biased robots? March 31, 2017
Algorithms can be pretty crude toward women March 24, 2027
Algorithms learn from us, and we can be better teachers March 13, 2017
Data-driven crime prediction fails to erase human bias March 8, 2017
Big data, big problems – interview with Cathy O’Neil March 1, 2017
How to Keep Your AI From Turning Into a Racist Monster February 13, 2017
Code-Dependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithm Age February 6, 2017
We put too much trust in algorithms and it’s hurting our most vulnerable December 29, 2016
Discrimination by algorithm: scientists devise test to detect AI bias December 19, 2016
A simplified political history of Big Data December 16, 2016
Hiring Algorithms Are Not Neutral December 9, 2016
How Algorithms Can Bring Down Minorities’ Credit Scores December 2, 2016
Put Away Your Machine Learning Hammer, Criminality Is Not A Nail November 29, 2016
The Foundations of Algorithmic Bias November 7, 2016
Should we trust predictive policing software to cut crime? October 27, 2016
Google researchers aim to prevent AIs from discriminating October 7, 2016
How algorithms rule our working lives September 1, 2016
Is criminality predictable? Should it be? June 30, 2016
Artificial Intelligence’s White Guy Problem June 25, 2016
There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. May 23, 2016 The company that sells this program (Northpointe) has responded to the criticisms here. Northpointe asserts that a software program it sells that predicts the likelihood a person will commit future crimes is equally fair to black and white defendants. Following such response, Jeff Larson and Julia Angwin has written another response (Technical Response to Northpointe) re-examined the data. They argue that they have considered the company’s criticisms, and stand by their conclusions.
The Real Bias Built In at Facebook May 19, 2016
As World Crowds In, Cities Become Digital Laboratories December 11, 2015
Algorithmic processes and politics might seem far removed from each other. However, if anything, the recent political climate is indicative of how algorithms can be computational tools for political agendas. Here and here are exemplar twitter threads that highlight particular Twitter accounts used as tools for political agenda. The articles below are, in some way or another, related to algorithms in the political arena.
How People Inside Facebook Are Reacting To The Company’s Election Crisis October 20, 2017
Russian Facebook ads: 70 million people may have seen them October 4, 2017
Google and Facebook Have Failed Us – The Atlantic October 2, 2017
Zuckerberg’s Preposterous Defense of Facebook September 29, 2017
“Fake news” tweets targeted to swing states in election, researchers find September 28, 2017
As Google Fights Fake News, Voices on the Margins Raise Alarm September 26, 2017
Facebook blocked an ad for a march against white supremacy: September 25, 2017
Facebook enabled advertisers to reach “Jew haters” September 14, 2017
Facebook and Google, show us your ad data Understanding how they influence us is crucial to the future of our democracy. September 13, 2017
RT, Sputnik and Russia’s New Theory of War September 13, 2017
American politics needs new rules for the Facebook era September 12, 2017
Russia’s Facebook Fake News Could Have Reached 70 Million Americans September 8, 2017
Forum Q&A: Philip Howard on Computational Propaganda’s Challenge to Democracy July 25, 2017. “Computational propaganda, or the use of algorithms and automated social media accounts to influence politics and the flow of information, is an emerging challenge to democracy in the digital age. Using automated social media accounts called bots (or, when networked, botnets), a wide array of actors including authoritarian governments and terrorist organizations are able to manipulate public opinion by amplifying or repressing different forms of political content, disinformation, and hate speech.”
Voter profiling in the 2017 Kenyan election June 6, 2017
Confronting a Nightmare for Democracy May 4, 2017
Robert Mercer: the big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media Feburary 26, 2017
Revealed: how US billionaire helped to back Brexit Feburary 26, 2017
The Truth About The Trump Data Team That People Are Freaking Out About Feburary 16, 2017
The Data That Turned the World Upside Down Jan 28, 2017
Inside the Trump Bunker, With Days to Go: Win or lose, the Republican candidate and his inner circle have built a direct marketing operation that could power a TV network—or finish off the GOP. October 27, 2016
For a more scholarly read
Caliskan-Islam, A., Bryson, J. J., & Narayanan, A. (2016). Semantics derived automatically from language corpora necessarily contain human biases. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.07187.
Chouldechova, A. (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00056. (PDF)
Datta, A., Sen, S., & Zick, Y. (2016, May). Algorithmic transparency via quantitative input influence: Theory and experiments with learning systems. In Security and Privacy (SP), 2016 IEEE Symposium on (pp. 598-617). IEEE. (PDF)
Datta, A., Tschantz, M. C., & Datta, A. (2015). Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2015(1), 92-112.
Monahan, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2016). Risk assessment in criminal sentencing. Annual review of clinical psychology, 12, 489-513.
Yeung, K. (2017). Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.
Zafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2017, April). Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: Learning classification without disparate mistreatment. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 1171-1180). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.